Skip to main content

Abbasid Empire, tried to change Arabic Text of Quran

At the beginning of 7th Century there were two superpowers, Romans, and Zoroastrian Sassanid Empire of Persia. Bother Superpowers were defeated by Muslim-Generals. Millennia old Zoroastrian Empire was totally collapsed. Now because Zoroastrians could not face Muslims in battlefield, therefor; they started to destroy faith of Muslims in Ideological field. Defeated Persians got full chance for Revenge after year 750 CE when Abbasid with the support of Persian Zoroastrian, revolted against Omayyad Caliphs, and finally built their Abbasid Empire in year 750 CE. Abbasid were Pro-Persian and Pro-Zoroastrians. Tutors of their Children, and almost all Ministers in the era of Abbasid Caliph Haroon Rashid were Persian Zoroastrians from Bramka dynasty/ancestry. Even wives of some Abbasid Caliphs and Princes were Persian Zoroastrians. So, now Iron was hot enough to beat and bend. Zoroastrians Ministers tried to change Arabic Text of Quran but badly failed because there were thousands and thousands Huffaaz out there, and they could catch even if one word of Quran is changed. God has put these Huffaaz as a Check on Quranic Text. Say: In fact Huffaaz are Divine Guards of Quran 15:9, 17:88, 41:42. If all Books and Computer archives are thrown into Ocean; Quran will be right back within hours. Just bring One Hafiz, and print whole, exactly same Quran which was being recited by Prophet Mohammad PBUH 1400 years ago. Hafiz is that Person who memorizes whole Quran cover to cover. Plural of Hafiz is Huffaaz or Huffaz.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Allah details his Book Quran

🔸 ALLÂH DETAIL HIS BOOK : The following AYAT make it absolutely clear  that the only source necessary for mankind's  guidance is the GOD’S WORD ALONE, and A MŪMĪN - TRUSTWORTHY CANNOT INTRODUCE ANY OTHER MANMADE RELIGIOUS SOURCE AS JUDGEMENT ALONG WITH THE QURAN❗️ IN THE ENTIRE QURAN there is not one unequivocal statement that categorically  asserts the requirement of other sources being necessary to explain the Quran or which are required for mankind's guidance❗️   The burden of proof remains solely with those that assert such a belief to provide clear unequivocal evidence from the Quran for the requirement of manmade religious sources❗️   ✅7:051 "Who take their DEEN for an idle sport  and a play and this life's world deceives them;  so today We forsake them, as they neglected  the meeting of this day of theirs and as they  denied Our AYAT (Arabic: Ayatina) And certainly We have brought them  a Book which We have made clear  with ...

Ahle-Kitab(Sl:41-48)

🥀41-48=AHLE KITAB(44-Khataman Nabi,48-Mirza Gulam Ahmed Kadiyani) 🚵45-Extra Article-3(Goni post) Sl-41-  AHLEKITAB-1 . Sl-42- AHLE.KITAB-2 . Sl-43- AHLE.KITAB-3 . Sl-44- AHLE.KITAB-4  (Khatam Nabi) . 45- Extra-Article . Sl-46- AHLE.KITAB-5 . Sl-47- AHLE.KITAB-6 . Sl-48- AHLE.KITAB.MIRZAGULAM.KADIYANI-7

End portion obey...

This is why we cannot blindly rely on words of men, even when they are messengers: Only God’s revelation (the Quran) is perfect and does not contain any “contradictions” as witnessed in  4:82 . The Quran provides us the only authentic hadiths of past messengers (they usually provide good examples, and sometimes bad ones, proving how imperfect they are), as well as authentic hadiths of all kind of human beings in the history of mankind (kings, soldiers, men, women, believers, disbelievers, angels, satan…). In addition, when it comes to hadiths collections, we know that the earliest were written down about two centuries after Muhammad passed away. Not only Muhammad’s hadiths could not have consistently provided good examples even if written at the time he uttered them (he was according to the Quran a very imperfect man), it is next to impossible to know what hadiths may be 100% in line with the Quran and which ones are not: They contain numerous contradictions, and the rules that wer...